the code consists of at least fifty macromolecular components which are themselves coded in the DNA. Thus the code cannot be translated except by using certain products of its translation. This constitutes a baffling circle; a really vicious circle, it seems, for any attempt to form a model or theory of the genesis of the genetic code."
Most, if not all, evolutionists would say that life could not "evolve" today for at least two reasons. First, if the basic proteins and molecules for life did come together by chance ("a fat chance"), they would be absorbed or used by all of the living things now present, which would not allow them to "evolve" further. Second, the atmospheric and environmental conditions under which life first evolved were different from today's conditions. Thus, since we do not have the same conditions, we cannot expect the same results. Note that to make their theory even plausible they must assume different conditions on the earth. However, all life as we know it, survives in the type of environment we have today.
As a result, most evolutionists believe that given the right conditions, life will inevitably happen. They admit that they do not know what these conditions are. They are desperately searching in vain for some fundamental law or principle that would account for first life and for the subsequent "evolution" of life. They admit that given present circumstances and known laws, that life could not have originated or evolved. However, given different conditions coupled with an as yet undiscovered "law of evolution," life would have inevitably happened and progressed to the forms we have today.