IMPOSSIBLE HURDLE #3:
Symbiosis is Incompatible with Evolution
Symbiosis is the living together in a mutually beneficial relationship between two unrelated organisms. If evolution is true, then animals that live in such a relationship must have evolved at exactly the same time---an impossible scenario.

Darwin stated, "If it could be proved that any part of the structure of any one species had been formed for the exclusive good of another species, it would annihilate my theory, for such could not have been produced through natural selection."

1. Bees & flowers
2. Termites & bacteria
3. Surinam toad & his cousins
4. Dodo bird & Calvaria

5. Sirax & Ibalia wasps
6.  The botfly & the mosquito
7.  Three-toed sloth and algae
8. Yucca moth & Yucca plant

IMPOSSIBLE HURDLE #4:

The Ability to Think Provides No Thought For Evolution
Evolution has no way of explaining how the ability to reason ever came about. Man's ability to think about his thinking and to work with abstract thoughts is an insurmountable stumbling block to

evolution. C.S. Lewis also pointed out that even our ability to reason would be called into question if atheistic evolution were true. He stated, "If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision, then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident, and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too. If so, then all our thought processes are mere accidents the accidental byproduct of the movement of atoms. And this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else's. But if their thoughts--i.e, of Materialism and Astronomy--are merely accidental by-products, why should we believe them to be true? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents."

IMPOSSIBLE HURDLE #5:
The Origin of Life is a Deathblow to Evolution
Three Wrong Views
1. Spontaneous Generation
2. Different Atmosphere and Primordial Soup
3. Life is Inevitable if the Conditions are Right

All of our real-world experience, especially in the "information age," would indicate that to rely on accidental copying mistakes to generate real information is the stuff of wishful thinking by "true believers," not science. The noted philosopher of science, the late Sir Karl Popper, commented: "What makes the origin of life and of the genetic code a disturbing riddle is this: the genetic code is without any biological function unless it is translated; that is, unless it leads to the synthesis of the proteins whose structure is laid down by the code. But the machinery by which the cell (at least the non-primitive cell, which is the only one we know) translates